<목차>
Chapter I. Introduction
1. Background to the Research
2. Purpose of the Research
Chapter II. Current Status of the Korean Government’s Performance Evaluation System
1. Legal System
1.1. Legal Objectives of the Government Performance Evaluation System
1.2. Statutory Provisions for the Government Performance Evaluation System
1.3. Analysis of the Government Performance Evaluation Act
2. System Organization
2.1. Operating Methods for Government Performance Evaluation
2.2. The Transition in Government Performance Evaluation in Korea and Its Main Focus
2.3. Government Performance Evaluation System in Korea
3. Case Study: Evolution of the Performance Management System
3.1. Characteristics of Strategic Performance Management
3.2. A Brief History of the Korean Performance Management System
3.3. The Review and Analysis System of the Public Sector
3.4. A Balanced Measurement System for Public Organizations
4. Conclusion
Chapter III. The Current Status of the Mongolian Government Performance Evaluation System
1. Legal Framework for Government Performance Management in Mongolia
1.1. Changes and Reform in the Performance Evaluation of Government Operations
1.2. Changes to and Reform of Government Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) Regulations
1.3. Indicators for the Annual Performance Evaluation of Central State Administrative Organizations
1.4. Evaluation of Government Official’s Performance
2. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Mongolian Government Performance
2.1. Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and the Structure of Mongolian Government Performance
2.2 Government PM&E Process Mapping
2.3. The Capacity and Possibilities for Government PM&E
3. Examples of the Performance Monitoring and Evaluation of the Mongolian Government
3.1. External Evaluation of the Implementation of a National Program on the Prevention and Control of Disease Caused by Unhealthy Habits
3.2. Evaluation of the Results of PM&E of the Government: A Case Study
3.3. Customer Evaluation of Development Policy
4. Summary
Chapter IV. Implications from the Comparison between the Korean and Mongolian Government Performance Evaluation Systems
1. Implications of the Korean System
2. Implications of the Mongolian System
Chapter V. Conclusion
